Blog: Nezua
 
 
See all of Nezua's blog posts
Humane Beings and An Ancient Hate
Posted July 10, 2008 at 1:02 PM

ACCORDING TO FBI STATISTICS, hate crimes targeting Latinos are on the rise nationally and have been since 2003. Just between 2003 and 2006 attacks on Latinos simply for being Latino have jumped by 35%. Many of these cases still are not prosecuted as "hate crimes," however. Even when the evidence overwhelmingly shows to any reasonable person that this is the case.


A gruesome but apt example of this was when David Tuck, a known Neo-Nazi and Skinhead, yells out "White Power" as he pours bleach on a Latino's face, sodomizes him with a broken pipe and beats him for five hours. (The state of Houston omitted the Hate Crime charge claiming the charges level against Tuck already carried a life sentence. which prompts this writer to ask why have a "hate crime" classification if it is not about the very morality of the charge?)


So who knows how many crimes against Latinos, African Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, gays and others are perpetrated every day? Not so that someone can get a bite to eat, or even so a junkie can get a fix. But just because the victim happens to not be white, or straight, or in some other way "normal" when posed next to whatever ideal these disgusting groups revere.


And who do we hold accountable for this cancer on our People and Nation?


The Eugene Register Guard brings up how hateful anti-immigrant rhetoric that would have once been relegated to the bowels of our nation's populace—such as in White Supremacist groups like the KKK and groups to which David Tuck have endorsed—have been brought to the mainstream by talk radio hosts (like Rush Limbaugh), TV pundits (like Bill O'Reilly and Pat Buchanan) and even political candidates (such as Tom Tancredo). It slips in under the guise of targeting "those aliens." The Mexicans, of course.


Thoughtful people can disagree about, and respectfully debate, immigration policy: What’s the best way to secure this country’s borders? How many foreigners should be admitted and for what purpose? What should be done with the 13 million illegal immigrants already in this country?

But extreme sentiments, once the exclusive province of white supremacists, have begun to seep into the mainstream. They’ve become the common verbal currency of nativist immigration-reform activists, talk radio hosts, cable TV commentators and even elected officials who smear immigrants as criminal aliens, invaders, terrorists and cockroaches human detritus whose dangerous, lawless presence must be swept from this country.

Few go so far as to actually endorse violence against immigrants. But no one should be deceived that’s the inevitable result of dehumanizing rhetoric, as white nationalist, racist skinhead and an array of other groups are agitated by the anti-immigrant rhetoric.


The presidential primaries have done distressingly little to address this problem, and, in some instances, have fanned the flames.


Hate crimes on the rise - Report links increase to anger over immigration, Eugene/Springfield Register Guard


So we need to find a way to discuss issues like immigration with some sanity and humanity if we care about those same things that our very law is purported to safeguard. Such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. For all humans, not just those with stamped papers or pale skin or a lover of the opposite sex.


Because it is clear that being reckless and violent in our speech is tied to being violent in action, and just like violence against women, dehumanizing frames are used to justify and pave the way toward actual physical harm. Julie Oglesby, a 25 year old resident of Springfield thinks that George W. Bush's War on "Terrorism" and the occupation of Iraq have a lot to do with the rising violence here at home.


"The atmosphere since 9/11...and with so many vets now coming home from Iraq with this mindset. It's one where we think in these terms...us and them. I think the whole mood since 9/11 ties into the hate crimes that are increasing."


Hate crimes are on the rise in Oregon, as well. Except here, we don't even classify them as "Hate Crimes." A crime such as three white men beating an elderly black man with a bat or the home of a Jewish family being vandalized with anti-Semitic graffiti or a black man having a rock thrown through his window adorned with racist slurs are filed under "intimidation" offenses. In fact, if you check the links above that lead to KEZI TV, you will note that the site won't even use the words "hate crime," instead substituting "bias crime." As if caving in someone's head with a bat is like being predisposed to vanilla ice cream over chocolate. Just a little bias going on.


We allow ugly, violent, hateful talk on our airwaves and from our political figures, even. Too often, this seems to be accepted because the targets are not like "us." And then in many cases where the suggested violence explodes into unfortunate reality, we still refuse to call hate by its name. But If we don't talk about these blights upon our national conscience, how can we change them? What kind of nation is this, after all? True, what we now call the United States of America began with the attempted genocide of Native Americans. True, this nation began with conquest and slavery and theft, and all perpetrated against those that America's European ancestors saw as inferior savages and lesser beings.


How different is this than all the talk about Illegals? About "filthy invaders" who are "stealing" all our resources—words I've had sent to me personally when blogging about immigration issues—but who in actuality are an integral part of this economic engine that feeds you and me and allows us all our comforts? And who are suffering with little protection from the law in many cases.


Are we ready for real change? We cannot change the past. But we can recognize the resonance of the same vile modality of divisive and hateful thinking and we can call it out. All of us, for we all live here, and all believe in Liberty and Justice for all. One would hope.



 
 
Group
 
   
 
Rate This
3 Ratings
Take Action On
 
 
Tags: human rights   Immigration   Latino   George W. Bush   racism   justice   hate crimes   tom tancredo   humanity   Native Americans   David Tuck   Neo-Nazi   Skinhead   White Power
Views: 102    Favorited: 1
URL:
 
 
Comments(6)
Post a Comment
BrianTRich 92 days ago

People say that racism is on the decline in the United States, but it appears it's just getting a rebranding instead.  When I hear people like Tancredo, Dobbs and Buchanan all but endorse a militarized, forced exodus of Hispanic Americans, with the acceptance of the mass media and every prominent politician, I get a sick feeling in my gut like the country has really lost its sight of what made it truly great in the first place.


Then you throw in the crime, violence and hate, which is all part of a self-perpetuating cycle, and it paints a much bigger, much sadder picture.


I think it's a problem too that many people see Hispanics as "invaders" like you mention, while feeling bad for African Americans who were forced to come here.  It allows people to sympathize with some hate crime victims and think that other victims may deserve it or should be able to expect it.  Obviously this is an insane point of view to take, but then again people like David Tuck don't seem too sane in the first place.


Well-written piece.

Re: Nezua 92 days ago
Thank you, Brian. I agree.
tikiday 87 days ago

Your piece is well written and it prompted me to reply, and form some opinions of my own.


Regarding the statistics of a 35% increase in hate crimes targeted specifically towards latinos, I did not let myself become alarmed. I wonder, how does that percentage translate into real numbers?  Don't get me wrong, every hate crime committed deserves to be labeled as such and prosecuted with the full force of the law. However statistics can be misleading. My concern is that even thought this is a real and serious problem it tends to be labled too quickly as an epidemic or worse yet exploited for the sake of media ratings.


 


The rebranding of the hate crimes as bias crimes, though objectionable, comes across as an attempt to be politically correct and not purposely misleading. Filing of hate crimes as intimidation offenses however DOES seem to repudiate the atrocity of the crimes. We should not be afraid of using such a term in our legal system. However does the fact that they are filed as intimidation offenses also coincide with a less severe penalty? If not, then it is really an argument of semantics and not justice.


 


Concerning the hateful talk that radio personalities engage in, though it is dissapointing it does not aggravate me as much as the hateful and offensive talk of some Republican politicians. Their accusations are bold and resoundly ignorant. Who knows how much of it their constituents believe when they hear them speak? I doubt a large audience of white, wealthy conservatives has any significant contact with latino immigrants, so they are suceptible to believeing the lies. What's worse, and perhaps most repulsive to me of all the talk against immigrants is that, these politicians surely do not believe what they